data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40427/40427896d3a50f502be762d5389e6855655a1642" alt=""
Proscio goes on to offer a theory for why left leaning discourse is so obtuse. It's centered around the idea that as the foundation community's ideals about altruism, sacrifice and the common good loose force in a culture dominated by the materialist ideology of the marketplace, left leaning organizations retreat and come to develop a culture of isolation complete with a secret and inbred language all their own.
We disagree. In our view it's quite the opposite. Foundationspeak is what it is because foundations seek to align their language with their primary reference group, academics, policy makers and other experts who require a (seemingly) value neutral language in order to sound non-partisan, dispassionate and ultimately, scientific. As Proscio himself points out, much foundationspeak parrots the latest language of business school-- 'metrics', 'value-proposition', etc. Straight forward talk about beliefs and values are nowhere to be found.
This theoretical disagreement aside, there is much in this essay to value. We particularly liked his deconstruction of some leading foundation buzzwords and his presentation of the pro-jargon position-- yes there is such a thing and it is more compelling than you may think.
Take a look. Whatever position in the jargon wars you take, it's nice to know the arguments on both sides.
By the way, you can find a complete dictionary of foundation jargon, based largely on this essay buy clicking here.
No comments:
Post a Comment